The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) has captivated every industry, including GRC. We recently conducted research that shows the vast majority of GRC professionals are using AI in their GRC program or planning to implement it in 2025. However, as organizations explore these advanced systems, many will find themselves grappling with a fundamental issue: AI requires an enormous amount of high-quality, well-organized data.
A growing number of businesses are recognizing the importance of addressing the AI data gap. The AI data gap refers to the disconnect between the data AI models need to function effectively and the data organizations currently have.
As AI becomes an essential part of GRC, adopting a data-first approach is not merely a strategic choice; it is critical to ensuring robust compliance and effective risk management.
What is the AI Data Gap in GRC?
The AI data gap emerges when organizations struggle with fragmented, incomplete, or low-quality data. In GRC, the AI data gap specifically means a lack of centralized, high-quality GRC data-evidence.
The AI data gap limits the effectiveness of even the best AI-powered compliance and risk management tools. In fact, it significantly raises the risk of using them.
Let’s look at three common challenges to see how:
- Siloed Compliance Data: Compliance and risk data often exist in isolated systems, making it challenging to create a unified, comprehensive dataset for AI analysis. AI can’t understand your organizational context if it doesn’t have information from all systems.
- Low-Quality Data: GRC information is often scattered across tables or gathered as screenshots. Inconsistent, outdated, or incomplete data undermines the reliability of AI-driven insights.
- Lack of Structure: AI only has the context of the data you provide. Unstructured or poorly organized data limits AI’s ability to provide accurate risk predictions or compliance tracking.
If you want an AI-driven GRC tool to function effectively across multiple domains, it will need structured access to complete, up-to-date information across the organization. A GRC AI agent offering advice based on incomplete or outdated information could easily make a bad recommendation that opens the door to more risk.
How the AI Data Gap Impacts Compliance and Risk Management
It’s important to remember that AI is not magical, and it is not human. However “smart” AI systems become, they cannot fill in the blanks or understand the context if they don’t have all the necessary information.
The consequences of the AI data gap are far-reaching, affecting every aspect of GRC:
- Inaccurate Risk Assessments: Poor data quality can lead to incorrect risk identification and a flood of false positives, burdening the team with extra issues that require manual review.
- Regulatory Compliance Challenges: Without high-integrity data, organizations may struggle to provide audit-ready reports and ensure regulatory adherence. AI can only accelerate audit or reporting processes when it has access to the necessary data.
- Impeding AI-Powered Automation: When there are gaps in the data, AI can’t deliver continuous monitoring or good predictive analytics. Instead of proactive risk management, organizations are left with reactive, inefficient processes.
Without good data, a system intended to give good advice and reduce manual effort can end up doing the opposite.
{{ banner-image }}
Why a Data-First Approach is Essential for AI in GRC
To bridge the AI data gap, organizations must prioritize a data-first approach to GRC. This means building a strong foundation of high-quality, structured, compliance-ready data before deploying AI models.
Continuous monitoring is the surest way to create a robust data foundation. With live data from across your controls, GRC AI agents can spot and address risks in real time rather than working off stale data from periodic audits.
When you feed AI systems structured and governance-aligned data, they can learn about your organization and begin to analyze risks effectively for your unique business context. Without that context, the best they can do is give cookie-cutter advice—and they might steer you in the wrong direction entirely.
Comprehensive, high-quality data also lets AI intelligently map regulatory changes to existing controls. Context-aware AI can help your organization stay ahead of relevant regulatory changes with less effort. Instead of needing to map changes manually, all your team has to do is review the AI's work.
The Future of AI in GRC: Why Organizations Must Close the Data Gap Now
AI-powered GRC is no longer a distant vision—it’s becoming the new reality. But it’s still early days. It can be hard enough to tell whether AI features are practical or not. Without high-quality data, even the best AI systems become unreliable, making compliance less efficient and raising regulatory risks.
At Anecdotes, we’re setting a new standard in GRC by pioneering a data-first approach that ensures AI models have access to structured, high-quality data they need to perform at scale. Continuous monitoring empowers organizations to embrace the next generation of AI-driven GRC solutions with confidence.
Is Your Data Helping or Hindering Your AI Adoption Goals?
When it comes to AI in GRC, the quality of your data makes all the difference. There are no two ways around it: the success of your AI initiatives depends on a solid data foundation. Jumping into AI without addressing your data quality can lead to setbacks that slow progress and introduce risks.
By focusing on high-quality GRC data now, you’re not just keeping pace but setting yourself up for enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and resilience as new technologies emerge.
Is your organization ready to make the most of AI? Learn more about Anecdotes’ data-first approach and how it powers the next generation of AI-driven GRC solutions.
Key Takeaways
What you will learn
About the author
